April
2015
You will recall that
the first five characters in an asteroid’s name tell us when it was discovered,
in this case in 2014 in the second half of July. This provisional name will be used until
there is a long enough history of accurate tracking (usually at least one full
synodic period, the time needed to “lap” Earth in its orbit around the Sun), to
certify a precise, accurately predictable, orbit. The synodic period is about 2 years for most
NEAs. At that time the asteroid will be
given a catalog number such as 155629, at which point it will be referred to as
155629 2014 PP69. Once an asteroid has
been cataloged the discoverer may propose a name for it, such as Eros or Ceres;
let’s call this one Egbert. Then it will
be called 155629 Egbert; just plain Egbert to its friends. But the object of this post is just plain
2014 PP69: in the nine months since its discovery there has been no opportunity
for it to pass by Earth again, and therefore no chance to assign it a very
precise orbit and enter it into the catalog of numbered asteroids. Once the refined orbit is determined, the discoverer of the asteroid gets to give it a name.
So here’s what’s
unusual about 2014 PP69: its perihelion distance of 1.25 AU, which qualifies it
as an Amor asteroid, contrasts sharply with its aphelion distance of 41.79 AU,
well outside the orbits of Neptune and Pluto and well into the Kuiper
Belt. Its orbital period is an
incredible 99.84 years, longer than that of Halley’s Comet. But that’s not all: the inclination of its
orbit is 93.63 degrees, meaning that it orbits almost at right angles to the
plane of the Solar System—in fact, the orbit is slightly retrograde, moving around the Sun in a direction opposite to that
followed by the planets. The
eccentricity of its orbit is 0.942, higher than that of the typical
short-period comet. At perihelion, closer
to Mars’ orbit than to Earth’s, it is traveling at a whopping 40 kilometers per
second.
What do we know about
the asteroid itself? Almost
nothing. The discovery images show that
it has a visual (H) magnitude of 20.17, which, by the crude “rule of thumb”
used for newly discovered NEAs (an assumed average albedo of 0.14; 14%
reflectivity in visible light) corresponds to a diameter of about 330
meters. However, the orbit is cometary,
suggesting that a more realistic albedo would about 0.035. If it’s that bright and that black, then its
cross-section area must be four times as large, and its diameter twice as
large, as this crude guess would suggest.
That implies eight times the volume and about eight times the mass,
raising the question of its impact hazard.
The good news is that, despite its large size and kinetic energy, the
point at which it crosses the plane of Earth’s orbit is far outside our
neighborhood.
The body is almost
certainly of cometary composition, similar to the Centaurs and the Kuiper Belt
bodies and to short-period comets. A
reasonable guess would be that it is about 60% by mass ices and about 40% rock,
which in turn contains perhaps 5-10% of organic matter, mostly complex
polymers.
Sending a spacecraft to
visit 2014 PP69 would be extremely difficult because of its very high relative
velocity. And then there is the problem
that the next optimal launch opportunity is a century off.
How soon will 2014 PP69
qualify for a catalog number? On its
next pass through the inner Solar System we will have an opportunity to track
it again with such a long span of observations (a century!) that a very
accurate orbit can be calculated. That
will be in the year 2114. The bad news
is that the discoverer will no longer be alive to exercise the option of naming
his baby!
2 comments:
Wasn't WISE reactivated in 2013? Can't an asteroid's albedo be determined by comparing reflected visible light with infrared emissions?
Hi, Hap!
The answer to your question is generally "yes", but this baby spends almost all of its life far beyond the asteroid belt, where it is so cold (and small and distant from Earth) that it would be undetectably faint. Its orbit makes it very good at evading thermal measurements.
John
Post a Comment